See above. If the game is tight, of course you don't make a change for the

sake of change or just getting a guy reps. Nobody would do that. If the game is well in hand, Eason needs to get some game time so we build depth just like every other position. If it's close and Fromm is having a bad day and we need a spark, Eason is your only option.

In response to this post by AthensDAWGGA

Posted: 10/13/2017 at 3:21PM

Anyone here interested in seeing Eason play at all -- kudzoodawg 10/11/2017 7:28PM

Nope. WHEN the outcome of the game is a -- bubbaNearl 10/12/2017 3:22PM

No, bc Fromm needs more throws, not less... -- Brisco 10/12/2017 11:41AM

This! Exactly! -- AthensDAWGGA 10/12/2017 2:19PM

How did Eason fail? -- kudzoodawg 10/12/2017 8:41PM

Yup. Folks quickly forgot that Eason won the job and -- Dawgustus 10/13/2017 3:18PM

Second half... -- gulfportdawg 10/12/2017 07:23AM

Not until Dawgs are up by 3-4 TD's* -- gulfportdawg 10/12/2017 07:21AM

Would like to see Eason play the whole second half, with -- Dawgustus 10/11/2017 10:43PM

Why? -- AthensDAWGGA 10/12/2017 09:45AM

See above. If the game is tight, of course you don't make a change for the -- Dawgustus 10/13/2017 3:21PM

Agree ** -- LoyalDawg 10/12/2017 09:09AM

Sure, if he is the No 1 QB or if we have a 40 PT lead -- AthensDAWGGA 10/11/2017 9:01PM

See above. If the game is tight, of course you don't make a change for the

Insert a Link