Hahahaha! Rivals rankings UGA/UH 2016-2013=11/41, 6/91, 7/77, 12/48

I know, I know, Nicholls St. is right there with us for talent too from what I've read on this board.

Now apparently Houston has had the most mis-ranked classes in all of history. If they have better talent despite trailing UGA by on average 55(!) ranking spots in Rivals, then Rivals must be shut down for consumer fraud.

UGA 4 year average Rivals rank = 9
UH 4 year average Rivals rank = 64

Funny Tom Herman didn't complain about the lack of talent he has to work with. He just lines up who he has on the team and beats the crap out of teams with higher rated talent.

If CKS' system requires a top 5 ranking before we can think of competing at a high level than we're in for it. It reminds me of a general who won't attack unless he has a 5:1 advantage in tanks/troops.

In response to this post by dawg86

Posted: 09/30/2016 at 11:45AM

Tom Herman of #6, 5-0 Houston on game planning and adjustments -- MtPDawg 09/30/2016 09:59AM

Here's the thing. Our personnel were recruited to -- Dawgustus 09/30/2016 3:00PM

I have to ask a question... -- Brisco 09/30/2016 12:46PM

As much as you enjoyed CMR losing -- MtPDawg 09/30/2016 12:54PM

RE; They have MUCH better personnel than we do. -- dawg86 09/30/2016 11:21AM

Hahahaha! Rivals rankings UGA/UH 2016-2013=11/41, 6/91, 7/77, 12/48 -- MtPDawg 09/30/2016 11:45AM

RE: Who cares about rankings in HS. Look the what takes place on the field. -- dawg86 09/30/2016 12:07PM

And I would gladly take their coach.* ** -- MtPDawg 09/30/2016 12:50PM

RE: We will see how the year plays out. We will learn a lot about -- dawg86 09/30/2016 2:44PM

Hahahaha! Rivals rankings UGA/UH 2016-2013=11/41, 6/91, 7/77, 12/48

Insert a Link